- Urban planning and Environmental Law
- Council for Permit Disputes , disputes concerning permits , Legal procedure for disputes concerning permits , permit , permit holder , the interest of the applicant , administrative court cases
Recently, a decree of the Flemish Government was published that changes the organisation and procedural rules of certain Flemish administrative courts. One of these courts is the Council for Permit Disputes. With this decree, the Flemish Government aims to optimise the current procedures in order to simplify and speed up the treatment by administrative court cases. In addition, disputes without direct interest or prejudice or without valid arguments are discouraged.
The most important changes are summarised below:
Currently, an appeal is only processed after payment of the court fees has been received. This takes an average of 14 days after an appeal is lodged, as only then does the court send a letter requesting for payment of the court fees.
The new decree stipulates that court fees are to be paid at the time of filing an appeal.
Until now, permit holders have always had to file a formal application to intervene in a procedure in which their permit is disputed.
The decree simplifies this, as the permit holder automatically becomes a party to the proceedings and can therefore always assert his defence.
Other parties can also benefit from a simplification, since they will now be able to intervene directly, without having to make a formal request in advance.
Intervening parties will also not be obliged to pay court fees, which removes an additional obstacle.
As a result of this amendment, an argument can only lead to the cancellation of a permit if:
With the new decree, an interim judgment will no longer be necessary before starting a mediation procedure.
Currently, no litigation fee is due when a request for suspension is rejected. This will be the case in the future.
In this way, the Flemish Government wishes to further discourage the initiation of suspension proceedings.
From now on, the Council for Permit Disputes can also substitute itself for the public authority if the authority granting the permit has had several opportunities to properly motivate its its decision, but has failed to do so.
Until this amendment, this was only possible if it related to the specific binding competence of the authorities. This is therefore a very important amendment.
These amendments will not enter into force until an implementing decree is published. We will keep you informed.