- Employment Law
- Marcel Houben
- notice period , first day of incapacity , status
Sunday, 7 July 2013, at midnight, it will be too late!
If the legislator and/or the industrial relations partners fail to reach an agreement, the legal
basis for determining the duration of the termination notices disappears for the blue-collar
workers who were hired by their current employer prior to 1 January 2012 and who do not fall within
the scope of a labour-management committee within the framework of which the termination notices
have been determined for the blue-collar workers pursuant to article 61 of the law relating to
employment contracts.
As
a result of legal tinkering work of the past, differing termination notices apply at present
depending on whether the blue-collar workers and the white-collar workers were hired by their
present employer prior to or after 1 January 2012.
As a result of the decision of the Constitutional Court, holding article 59 of the law relating to
employment contracts to be unconstitutional, this article 59 shall cease to have effect as from 8
July 2013 and only a legal vacuum remains for determining the duration of the termination notices
for the category of blue-collar workers referred to above.
Based on the philosophy of the Constitutional Court (discrimination and, therefore, annulment of
the article applicable to the blue-collar workers), logically, the termination notices for the
white-collar workers should be applied.
However, even then the question remains which rules should be applied, that is the ones which apply
to the white-collar workers hired prior to 1 January 2012 or the rules applicable to the
white-collar workers hired as from that date.
In any event, the 65-dollar question is which judge shall (dare) to render such a Salomon judgment
without a solid legal basis.
This post has also appeared on www.express.be, that you can consult by clicking here.